[Classweb-users] A-Z without the "e.g."
Pietris, Mary Kay
mpie at loc.gov
Mon Jun 3 15:08:03 EDT 2013
In this case BL2020.S5 should not be used, because there is an entire development for Sikhism in BL2017-2018.7. Except for one error, usage of BL2020.S5 was discontinued by 1960.
Each case needs to be examined on its merits. Here the Cutter represented an old usage.
We will delete this class number from the subject heading for Sikhs.
Mary K. D. Pietris
Library of Congress
Acquisitions and Bibliographic Access Directorate
Policy and Standards Division
From: classweb-users-bounces at classificationweb.net [mailto:classweb-users-bounces at classificationweb.net] On Behalf Of Gene Fieg
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2013 2:12 PM
Subject: [Classweb-users] A-Z without the "e.g."
When a list has A-Z without the "e.g.", are we to assume that the category has to established before we can use it?
There is no .S5, but LC uses it consistently.
So is "e.g." tacitly here in this list?
Claremont School of Theology
gfieg at cst.edu
Claremont School of Theology and Claremont Lincoln University do not represent or endorse the accuracy or reliability of any of the information or content contained in this forwarded email. The forwarded email is that of the original sender and does not represent the views of Claremont School of Theology or Claremont Lincoln University. It has been forwarded as a courtesy for information only.
Classweb-users mailing list
Classweb-users at classificationweb.net
More information about the Classweb-users